NYT sues Perplexity for copying content, after cease and desist order

Copyrights might well trump AIs retrieval practices, bets the NYT.
The Times says Perplexity is copying their journalism and delivering it without permission. (Picture: Adobe)
The New York Times sent a cease and desist order to Perplexity in 2024, but the company has persisted with copying NYT content in their responses, the lawsuit alleges.

Perplexity still generates outputs that are «identical or substantially similar to» content from the Times, writes CNBC, and sometimes even hallucinates responses that get attributed to them, writes Reuters.

— While we believe in the ethical and responsible use and development of AI, we firmly object to Perplexity’s unlicensed use of our content, says NYT spokesperson Graham James.

Perplexity seems unfazed by the lawsuit, saying in a statement that:

— Publishers have been suing new tech companies for a hundred years, starting with radio, TV, the internet, social media and now AI. Fortunately it’s never worked, or we’d all be talking about this by telegraph.

The NYT has previously also previously sued OpenAI for infringement.

Read more: The actual complaint, NYT announcement, writeups on Reuters and CNBC